1996

Abstracto

On 21 December 2000 and 21 May 2001 respectively, the complainants requested consultations with the US concerning the amendment to the Tariff Act of 1930 signed on 28 October 2000 with the title of “Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000” (the “Act”) usually referred to as “the Byrd Amendment”. According to the complainants the Act is inconsistent with the obligations of the United States under several provisions of the GATT, the AD Agreement, the SCM Agreement, and the WTO Agreement. In particular, the Act is alleged to be inconsistent with the obligations of the United States under: (i) Article 18.1 of the ADA in conjunction with Article VI:2 of the GATT and Article 1 of the ADA; (ii) Article 32.1 of the SCM Agreement, in conjunction with Article VI:3 of the GATT and Articles 4.10, 7.9 and 10 of the SCM Agreement; (iii) Article X(3)(a) of the GATT; (iv) Article 5.4 of the ADA and Article 11.4 of the SCM Agreement; (v) Article 8 of the ADA and Article 18 of the SCM Agreement; (vi) Article 5 of the SCM Agreement; and (vii) Article XVI:4 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO, Article 18.4 of the ADA and Article 32.5 of the SCM Agreement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/reports/25189840/55
2003-01-16
2024-11-22
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/reports/25189840/55
Loading
  • Published online: 16 Jan 2003
Este es un campo obligatorio
Por favor, introduce una dirección de correo electrónico válida
La aprobación fue un éxito
Datos inválidos
Ocurrió un error
La aprobación fue parcialmente exitosa, los siguientes elementos seleccionados no se pudieron procesar debido a un error
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cud3RvLWlsaWJyYXJ5Lm9yZy8K