Trade monitoring

For trade in goods and services to flow traders and governments need to know the rules. At no time is this more critical than at moments of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. New trade measures are being taken by governments every day in response to COVID-19. If the different actors engaged in supply chains are not aware of these new requirements they can struggle to adapt to the new conditions thereby risking unnecessary disruptions. Transparency is precisely about allowing access to this information and more. It enables governments and traders to keep up to date in a rapidly evolving trade landscape and provides.

In order to ensure transparency and to keep abreast of trade policies in support of sustainability the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) mandated the WTO Secretariat to compile and collate all environment-related measures notified to WTO. The database also includes environment-related entries found in Trade Policy Reviews (TPRs).

The Trade Policy Reviews conducted in the Western Hemisphere over 1989-2009 contain a wealth of information that puts in clear evidence the considerable improvements achieved in most American countries during the first two decades of operation of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism. Those Reviews show that trade liberalization came hand-in-hand with internal reforms and was generally of an autonomous nature and an intrinsic component of improved economic management. Trade liberalization slowed down during the second decade under review with tariffs having come down mostly during the earlier years. The use of non-tariff barriers also fell over time although at a slow pace in some of the smallest Members which found it difficult to implement the more complex trade policy instrument applied by larger countries. Export and other government assistance schemes proliferated throughout the continent but were often characterized by a lack of unity in the criteria used to assign and apply them. The review period also witnessed enormous changes in the services sectors where reforms usually proved more complex than in the goods area. The multilateral and other international trade agreements contributed to the stability of trade policies and the general rejection of protectionism although backtracking did occur in a number of cases. Because the commitments made during the Uruguay Round negotiation now fall short of the more liberal trade regimes that came to be over the review period most Members in the Americas could presently raise trade and investment barriers without violating multilateral rules. Thus the pressing need to conclude the Doha Development Agenda in order to lock in the considerable trade policy liberalization achieved during past years and to strengthen the multilateral trading system.

The WTO Secretariat has published a new information note on trade-related issues for COVID-19 vaccine production manufacturing and deployment. The note entitled “Developing and delivering COVID-19 vaccines around the world” explores how trade policy can play its part in ensuring the rapid roll-out of vaccines against COVID-19.

This paper looks at the various trade policies WTO Members have put into place to foster women’s economic empowerment. The analysis below is based on the information provided by WTO Members as part of their Trade Policy Review (TPRs) process from 2014 to 2018. Reports from the WTO Secretariat governments as well as the question and answer sessions were examined for the purpose of this paper.

This Working Paper contains some observations concerning the evolution of trade and trade-related policies in the Asia-Pacific region since the establishment in 1989 of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM) whose goal is to improve the transparency of these policies. It also draws some lessons from the Reviews undertaken. In particular the Paper examines how reforms either unilateral or in connection with bilateral regional or multilateral trade agreements can be greatly facilitated by transparency including cost-benefit (C-B) analyses of policies and measures that take full account not just of the interests of domestic producers but also those of other groups including exporters and domestic consumers. While high quality transparency is not cheap the costs of achieving it pale in comparison with the financial assistance involved and efficiency losses associated with such assistance. Trade Policy Reviews (TPRs) throw light not only on measures that appear to contravene WTO rules although that is not their purpose; more importantly they identify measures not seemingly covered by WTO rules which can nonetheless have economic effects equivalent to measures that are subject to these rules. One of the main lessons from these TPRs is that impediments to economic development are largely homegrown. Consequently unilateral structural reform of which liberalization of both trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) has been an integral part is of paramount importance. By fostering transparency particularly evaluating the effectiveness of policies and measures in achieving their objectives and their overall impacts (intended or unintended) on the economy the TPRM can be a catalyst for unilateral reform including liberalization of trade and FDI. Although the latter has received added impetus from multilateral liberalization under the auspices of the GATT/WTO the stalling of negotiations in connection with the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) should not preclude further unilateral liberalization. By contrast the benefits of preferential trade agreements are far from obvious notwithstanding their proliferation during the past decade throughout the Asia-Pacific region here few governments have subjected these agreements to rigorous cost-benefit analysis. Economies in the Asia-Pacific region especially East Asia have been much more successful than those in other regions in achieving sustained fast growth and thereby raising living standards and reducing poverty. This success can be attributed not so much to transparency which is largely lacking but to inter alia their broad outward-looking development strategy. This strategy has involved in particular an increasingly high degree of integration into the global economy with heavy reliance on growth of manufactured exports high rates of national saving to finance high rates of domestic investment including public investment in physical and social infrastructure (notably education and health) supplemented by FDI (as well as maintenance of macroeconomic stability reliance on a functioning market system to allocate resources and committed capable and credible governments). However this development strategy has left growth very heavily dependent on domestic investment and exports which dropped sharply in the wake of the global financial crisis that erupted in 2008. This and resulting current account imbalances and consequent trade tension has prompted a rethink in a number of East Asian economies of their development strategies. As a consequence China Chinese Taipei Korea and Malaysia for example are now attempting to wean their economies off investment and exports and give freer rein to domestic consumption. As circumstances (including comparative advantage) change and global resources become increasingly scarce policies need to be continually reviewed in order to ensure that second-best measures are replaced by more cost-effectiveness ones. As improved productivity is the key to sustained development in the long run policies need to be adapted to ensure that they facilitate rather than inhibit the efficient re-allocation of resources by markets in accordance with evolving comparative advantage. Reform needs to be ongoing therefore. Transparency builds support for and thus paves the way for such reform.