Trade facilitation and customs valuation
Filter :
Language
Publication date
Content type
Series
Authors
Uso integral de la tecnología en las aduanas inteligentes del futuro
El año 2021 puso de relieve el papel fundamental que desempeñan las aduanas como entidades facilitadoras del comercio mundial. Para que las cadenas de suministro mundiales sean más eficientes en el futuro las aduanas inteligentes han de reducir al mínimo los plazos y los costos que comporta el despacho además de gestionar de manera inteligente la entrada y salida de productos y vehículos. Tecnologías disruptivas como los dispositivos conectados a la Internet de las cosas permiten que equipos autónomos supervisen de manera efectiva la mercancía y hagan un seguimiento de las rutas.
Avant-propos de la Directrice générale de l’OMC
Nous vivons une époque d’évolution technologique rapide qui peut changer en profondeur les pratiques du commerce international. La nécessité de suivre cette évolution technologique et de bien comprendre ses implications peut effrayer bon nombre d’entre nous. Ce rapport permettra d’éclairer les « technologies de rupture » les plus pertinentes pour la gestion des frontières et aidera les gouvernements à mieux comprendre les défis et les avantages liés à l’utilisation de ces technologies dans l’environnement douanier.
Agradecimientos
La actualización del Informe de estudio sobre las tecnologías disruptivas (2022) es fruto del esfuerzo colectivo de las secretarías de la Organización Mundial de Aduanas (OMA) y la Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC) que han trabajado en estrecha colaboración con las administraciones de aduanas de los Miembros representantes del sector privado y otras partes interesadas. El informe ha sido elaborado por Milena Budimirovic Özlem Soysanli Vyara Filipova y Lesego Mmolai de la OMA y Emmanuelle Ganne y Sheri Rosenow de la OMC. Zakaria Imessaoudene de la OMC ayudó en las tareas de investigación.
Prólogo de la Directora General de la OMC
Vivimos en una época de rápidos cambios tecnológicos que pueden alterar profundamente el desarrollo del comercio internacional. Para muchos estar al día de las últimas tecnologías y entender plenamente sus implicaciones puede ser una tarea abrumadora. Este informe arrojará luz sobre las llamadas “tecnologías disruptivas” que revisten mayor interés para la gestión de fronteras y ayudará a los Gobiernos a comprender mejor los desafíos y los beneficios de su utilización en las aduanas.
Introducción: ¿tecnologías «disruptivas…» o (solo) «emergentes»?
¿A qué nos referimos exactamente cuando hablamos de “tecnologías disruptivas”? Según el diccionario de Cambridge una tecnología disruptiva es una nueva tecnología que cambia radicalmente la forma de hacer las cosas. Aunque no podemos estar seguros de qué tecnologías lograrán este cometido en el futuro en los últimos años el público ha aceptado de manera generalizada el término “tecnologías disruptivas” para referirse a la cadena de bloques la Internet de las cosas la inteligencia artificial la realidad virtual los drones la impresión 3D y otras tecnologías de vanguardia que son objeto de este Informe de estudio.
Avant-propos du Secrétaire général de l’OMD
Conscients de la nécessité de rester au fait des avancées dans le domaine des technologies de rupture et de nous efforcer de comprendre les défis et opportunités inhérents à ces technologies pour les administrations des douanes et la gestion des frontières nous présentons une version actualisée du Rapport d’étude sur les technologies de rupture. Au cours de ces trois années écoulées depuis sa première publication ce rapport s’est avéré être une source d’informations précieuse. Cependant compte tenu des nombreux projets pilotes et progrès réalisés entre temps nous avons pensé que l’heure était venue d’actualiser ce document pour garantir aux membres à la communauté des opérateurs et aux autres parties prenantes une information de qualité à propos des dernières évolutions sur le terrain et offrir un soutien supplémentaire en vue de la mise en oeuvre des normes de l’OMD telles que la Convention de Kyoto révisée.
Contexte
Au cours de ses 207e/208e sessions de mars 2015 et sur proposition de ses délégués le Comité technique permanent (CTP) de l’OMD a lancé le débat sur le thème de l’avenir de la douane. L’idée a surgi à l’occasion de discussions sur le rôle du CTP lors desquelles les délégués sont convenus que le Comité devait jouer un rôle plus actif et débattre de questions stratégiques et de thèmes tournés vers l’avenir.
Acknowledgements
The updated Study Report on Disruptive Technologies (2022) is the result of the collective effort of the World Customs Organization (WCO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Secretariats working closely with the Member Customs administrations private sector representatives and other stakeholders. The Report was prepared by Milena Budimirovic Özlem Soysanlı Vyara Filipova and Lesego Mmolai from the WCO and Emmanuelle Ganne and Sheri Rosenow from the WTO. Research assistance was provided by Zakaria Imessaoudene from the WTO.
Background
Based on the proposal submitted by the WCO Permanent Technical Committee (PTC) delegates the Future of Customs topic was launched at the 207th/208th Sessions of the PTC in March 2015. This came as a result of discussions on the role of the PTC where it was agreed that the Committee would take a more active role in discussing strategic matters and future-oriented topics.
Introduction: “disruptive…” or (just) “emerging” technologies?
When we talk about “disruptive technologies” what exactly do we mean? According to the Cambridge Dictionary a disruptive technology is a new technology that completely changes the way things are done. Even though we cannot be certain which technologies will accomplish this in the future the public has over the past years broadly accepted “disruptive technologies” as a term which refers to blockchain the Internet of Things artificial intelligence virtual reality drones 3D printing and other cutting-edge technologies which are the subject of this Study Report.
Conclusion
The findings from the Study Report and the case studies provided in the Annex reflect a high level of Customs interest and activity in the testing and implementation of three groups of technologies in particular. Over half of the Members that responded to the WCO’s 2021 ACS are already using IoT AI and ML while only two respondents are currently deploying blockchain technology. Information on numerous pilot projects and PoCs shared by the Customs administrations and other stakeholders show the interest in expanding the use of these technologies as well as the confidence in the benefits they will bring to Customs in achieving its objectives and supporting cross-border trade.
Foreword by the WCO Secretary General
Understanding the need to keep abreast of developments in the field of disruptive technologies and to seek to understand the challenges and opportunities they bring to Customs and border management we are presenting an updated version of the Study Report on Disruptive Technologies. In the three years since it was first published it has served as an important source of information. However considering the numerous pilot projects and progress that has been achieved in the meantime we believe the time is right to provide an update to ensure that Members the trading community and other stakeholders are well informed about the latest developments on the ground that can further support implementation of WCO standards such as the Revised Kyoto Convention.
Foreword
I have long been concerned by illicit trade. As Finance Minister in my home country Nigeria I witnessed how it harms societies and impedes economic growth and development. Although the full scale of illicit trade is often obscured by its clandestine nature there is little doubt about its impacts. Spurious products threaten people’s health as well as their livelihoods. Illicit trade undermines legitimate business activity abets corruption and acts as a drain on the revenue and resources governments need to address critical social and economic priorities. And when illicit traders join forces with corrupt officials and financiers the negative impacts are amplified. Illicit trade leaves no country developing or developed untouched.
Russia - Tariff Treatment of Certain Agricultural and Manufacturing Products
On 18 August 1997 the EC requested consultations with the US in respect of a ban on imports of poultry and poultry products from the EC by the US Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety Inspection Service and any related measures. The EC contended that although the ban is allegedly on grounds of product safety the ban does not indicate the grounds upon which EC poultry products have suddenly become ineligible for entry into the US market. The EC considered that the ban is inconsistent with Articles I III X and XI of GATT 1994 Articles 2 3 4 5 8 and Annex C of the SPS Agreement or Article 2 and 5 of the TBT Agreement.
Russie - Traitement tarifaire de certains produits agricoles et manufacturés
Le 12 août 2016 l’OMC a publié le rapport du Groupe spécial dans l’affaire engagée par l’Union européenne “Russie — Traitement tarifaire de certains produits agricoles et manufacturés” (WT/DS/485).
Rusia - Trato arancelario de determinados productos agrícolas y manufacturados
El 12 de agosto de 2016 la OMC emitió el informe del Grupo Especial sobre el caso planteado por la Unión Europea: “Rusia — Trato arancelario determinados productos agrícolas y manufacturados” (WT/DS/485).
TBT and Trade Facilitation Agreements
The average international trade transaction is subject to numerous procedural and documentation requirements which add to the costs of doing business as an importer or exporter and also use up scarce government resources. While these requirements can be necessary to fulfil policy objectives questions are often raised about why and how they are implemented. The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) adopted by WTO Members in 2014 seeks to expedite the movement release and clearance of goods across borders and reduce these trade transaction costs - by an average of 14.3 per cent as estimated by the 2015 World Trade Report. At the same time many WTO Agreements already contain provisions aimed at facilitating trade procedures and avoiding unnecessary costs. The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (the TBT Agreement) is one of these: its provisions on transparency and conformity assessment procedures some of which are applied at the border are of particular relevance in this context. The TFA and TBT Agreements are in fact complementary with the TFA introducing some new requirements/recommendations which are likely to apply to certain TBT measures. This paper maps out the linkages between these two Agreements. It does so with a view to informing TBT officials of the requirements and best practices emerging in the trade facilitation area as well as raising awareness amongst trade/customs officials of existing rules and evolving practices in the TBT area. The 2015 World Trade Report refers to “border agency cooperation” as the main TFA implementation challenge identified by developing countries and also points to the importance of cooperation and coordination between ministries as one of the main success factors. Considering that a significant share of import/export procedures and controls arise from the implementation of TBT measures a better understanding of the linkages between the TFA and the TBT Agreement (as well as other relevant WTO Agreements such as the SPS Agreement) will be crucial for effective implementation. It will also contribute to more streamlined technical assistance activities and raise awareness among TBT officials of the opportunities generated by trade facilitation projects. The procedures and practices of the WTO TBT Committee especially with regards to transparency and specific trade concerns could also be of interest to the future TFA Committee as it embarks on its task of furthering the implementation of the TFA. All these in turn will help reap the expected benefits of the new Trade Facilitation Agreement.
Making (Small) Firms Happy
This paper considers the asymmetric effect of Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) policies on heterogeneous exporters based on matching a detailed panel of French firm exports to a new database of Trade Facilitation Indicators (TFIs) released recently by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We analyze the effect of these TFIs on three trade-related outcomes: (i) exported value (firm intensive margin) (ii) number of products exported (product extensive margin) and (iii) average export value per product exported (product intensive margin). We find strong evidence of a heterogeneous effect of trade facilitation across firm size. While better information availability advance ruling and appeal procedures mainly benefit small firms the simplification of documents and automation tend to favor large firms’ trade. This is coherent with the idea that while some elements of the TFA simply reduce the fixed cost of exporting (favoring small firms in particular) other chapters in the TFA reduce the scope for corruption at borders making large firms less reluctant to serve corrupt countries.